Head of Research, Kirsty Mclardy discusses the emerging concept of ‘fractional twinning’ and the potential impact this leadership approach can have on organisations.
The language of leadership has been evolving as quickly as the challenges facing modern boards. Over the last few years, we have become accustomed to the term ‘fractional’, where expertise is brought in for part-time, high-impact engagements and it now rolls off the tongue when we discuss more flexible ways of working for senior executives. Livingston James Director, Sophie Randles, recently shared her thoughts on fractional executives and whether it might be the right trend for you in an article for The Scotsman.
However, in recent months, a new and intriguing concept has been gaining traction –“fractional twinning”, offering a new approach to the way in which organisations can draw on senior talent. More often than not and traditionally, each C-suite role has been seen as singular: one individual embodying the mandate, vision and accountability. Yet the demands of globalisation, regulatory complexity and the sheer pace of disruption increasingly strain that model. Kirsty Mclardy previously explored the potential success of utilising co-Chief Executives, i.e. two full-time individuals to perform one role. Similarly, Kirsty now explores the notion of fractional twinning, i.e. pairing senior executives to better perform a role, either with two fractional resources offering slightly different skillsets, or pairing a fractional “twin” with a full-time incumbent.
Fractional twins fall into two categories – identical, where two of the same skillset is brought in to move key initiatives forward – or “non-identical”, where complementary skillsets are sought to bring new insight and expertise. This approach can be utilised across any C-suite role, but could be particularly beneficial for CFOs, where additional expertise is required at key times, such as in preparation for a sale or exit, during IPO prep or post-merger integration etc., or for CMOs who may require additional specialist skills in areas such as data, digital or AI.
Pros and Cons
One of the most compelling aspects of fractional twinning is how it reflects broader societal shifts. Just as the workforce has embraced hybrid work and portfolio careers, leadership is becoming more fluid, adaptive and distributed. What might have seemed like a dilution of authority a decade ago is now reframed as resilience: no single point of failure, greater diversity of thought and a leadership model that mirrors the complexity of the markets it serves.
Of course, this is not without tension. Boards must consider how these shared roles might affect clarity of accountability, investor or market perception and cultural coherence within the organisation. There should also be consideration paid to the risks of short-termism, over-dependency and knowledge transfer gaps. But without risk, there is no reward, and these areas of tension are often what spark the most creative solutions. As McKinsey notes, resilience in leadership structures increasingly comes from plurality rather than singularity.
A Sign of Things to Come
Fractional twinning is still nascent. But for boards, its rise is worth watching closely. It is more than a talent tactic, it is a philosophical shift in how we think about leadership at the highest levels: not as a solitary role, but as a carefully balanced constellation.
In an era defined by volatility, perhaps the most radical act of leadership is to share it.
For more information on leadership, please contact Kirsty Mclardy on [email protected]
Fractional Twinning: Rethinking Leadership for a Complex Age
Head of Research, Kirsty Mclardy discusses the emerging concept of ‘fractional twinning’ and the potential impact this leadership approach can have on organisations.
The language of leadership has been evolving as quickly as the challenges facing modern boards. Over the last few years, we have become accustomed to the term ‘fractional’, where expertise is brought in for part-time, high-impact engagements and it now rolls off the tongue when we discuss more flexible ways of working for senior executives. Livingston James Director, Sophie Randles, recently shared her thoughts on fractional executives and whether it might be the right trend for you in an article for The Scotsman.
However, in recent months, a new and intriguing concept has been gaining traction –“fractional twinning”, offering a new approach to the way in which organisations can draw on senior talent. More often than not and traditionally, each C-suite role has been seen as singular: one individual embodying the mandate, vision and accountability. Yet the demands of globalisation, regulatory complexity and the sheer pace of disruption increasingly strain that model. Kirsty Mclardy previously explored the potential success of utilising co-Chief Executives, i.e. two full-time individuals to perform one role. Similarly, Kirsty now explores the notion of fractional twinning, i.e. pairing senior executives to better perform a role, either with two fractional resources offering slightly different skillsets, or pairing a fractional “twin” with a full-time incumbent.
Fractional twins fall into two categories – identical, where two of the same skillset is brought in to move key initiatives forward – or “non-identical”, where complementary skillsets are sought to bring new insight and expertise. This approach can be utilised across any C-suite role, but could be particularly beneficial for CFOs, where additional expertise is required at key times, such as in preparation for a sale or exit, during IPO prep or post-merger integration etc., or for CMOs who may require additional specialist skills in areas such as data, digital or AI.
Pros and Cons
One of the most compelling aspects of fractional twinning is how it reflects broader societal shifts. Just as the workforce has embraced hybrid work and portfolio careers, leadership is becoming more fluid, adaptive and distributed. What might have seemed like a dilution of authority a decade ago is now reframed as resilience: no single point of failure, greater diversity of thought and a leadership model that mirrors the complexity of the markets it serves.
Of course, this is not without tension. Boards must consider how these shared roles might affect clarity of accountability, investor or market perception and cultural coherence within the organisation. There should also be consideration paid to the risks of short-termism, over-dependency and knowledge transfer gaps. But without risk, there is no reward, and these areas of tension are often what spark the most creative solutions. As McKinsey notes, resilience in leadership structures increasingly comes from plurality rather than singularity.
A Sign of Things to Come
Fractional twinning is still nascent. But for boards, its rise is worth watching closely. It is more than a talent tactic, it is a philosophical shift in how we think about leadership at the highest levels: not as a solitary role, but as a carefully balanced constellation.
In an era defined by volatility, perhaps the most radical act of leadership is to share it.
For more information on leadership, please contact Kirsty Mclardy on [email protected]
Can we help?
If you are looking for leadership advisory or recruitment support, please get in touch with our team of experts.
More Articles...
The New Executive Mandate: Making High-Performance Sustainable
In our latest Knowledge Academy block, our discussions centred on “The Art of Impossible”, a book by Steven Kotler; using its ideas on motivation, focus, and sustained peak performance as a catalyst for deeper reflection on what it truly takes to thrive in fast-moving, high pressure environments such as ours.
The HR-CEO Paradox: Right Skills, Wrong Pathways
Despite possessing skills increasingly valued in modern leadership, such as emotional intelligence, change leadership, and organisational capability, HR leaders rarely progress to CEO roles. Livingston James Director, Ali Shaw recently shared insights from our latest research report in association with EY: The Future CEO Report, and how these findings can support succession planning for HR leaders.
Livingston James is Delighted to Partner with East Park to Appoint Chief Executive
East Park is a well‑established Scottish charity delivering specialist education and care services for children and young people with complex support needs. The organisation has a long history of providing safe, nurturing environments that enable young people to develop, grow, and prepare for adulthood.
The Chief Executive will lead the organisation overall, setting clear strategic direction and overseeing day‑to‑day delivery, while working closely with the Board to secure East Park’s long‑term sustainability and positive impact.